After a mostly depressing day of dramas, Sundance 2010 got a much needed jolt Sunday night.
The Eccles auditorium was overflowing and every seat was taken for “The Runaways,” a juiced up biopic about rocker Joan Jett and her original group of all-female players, The Runaways circa 1975.
Kristen Stewart, of “Twilight” fame and also another good Sundance film,”Welcome to the Rileys,” plays Jett circa 1975. Dakota Fanning, who is still just 15, takes the role of Cherie Currie, Joan Jett’s founding partner in The Runaways. The movie does feature what seems to be a heavily suggested love scene between the two which should be pretty controversial when “The Runaways” is released by Apparition Films.
There’s a lot going on in “The Runaways,” too: Tatum O’Neal plays Cherie’s mom (Dakota’s mom). And Lisa Marie Presley’s 20-year-old daughter, Riley, plays Dakota’s sister. Yes, Elvis and Priscilla Presley’s granddaughter! Do you feel old now?
“The Runaways” marks the auspicious feature film debut of music video director Floria Sigismondi. The film was scored by Sigismondi’s talented musician husband, Lillian Berlin (yes, he’s a man, a very nice young man). Michael Shannon is also featured as The Runaway’s infamous awful manager, Kim Fowley.
What can I tell you about Dakota Fanning? Two years ago, when she was 13, her character in the terrible “Hound Dog” was raped on screen. Now she’s a rocker having lesbian sex, smoking, drinking, snorting coke off the floor, wearing very hot lingerie because Currie was the precursor of Madonna. There may be some who are shocked by all this.
The fact is, she is more poised and together at 15 than most adults. She wears pearls. At the Q&A after the film, Dakota was so together that she actually took the mike from the as usual freaked-out seeming Kristen Stewart and answered questions.
At the afterparty, sponsored by Microsoft Bing, Dakota did have kind of a meathead personal bodyguard. But she’s only 15. When we spoke, she was courteous and lively as ever. She’s her generation’s Jodie Foster, that’s for sure. Meantime, Stewart — who’s turning 20 in April — is an utter basket case by comparison. She’s a talented actress, but her public presentation suggests a possible hyperventilation at any moment. Someone should work on this with her, and soon.
Meanwhile, Fanning and Stewart are also in the coming “Twilight” movie. They were in the last one together, too. But when Apparition releases “The Runaways” this spring, expect both of them to have legions and legions of new fans.
“The Runaways” works on a lot of levels, and will no doubt be a big hit with little effort. My only quibble is that the films cuts too fast from the demise of The Runaways to Joan Jett’s overnight hit with “I Love Rock and Roll.” The film ends on a minor note rather than with a big flourish. How did Jett come to record her signature hit, and why isn’t that song, in concert, a rockin’ finale? But these are little things. “The Runaways” provided just the energy that’s been missing here in Park City. We needed it.






January 25th, 2010 at 4:43 am
[...] Hollywood Reporter Blog: [...]
January 25th, 2010 at 5:22 am
[...] The Hollywood Reporter: [...]
January 25th, 2010 at 6:37 am
Roger! There are a couple of blind items discussing a celebrity trying to leave Scientology. People think it might be Priscilla and/or Lisa Marie. Grab some scoop! Actor Larry Anderson just blew; they can too! XD
January 25th, 2010 at 7:14 am
She is too young to actually be officially sexy, she is still a girl. I hope she gets proper protection from sane adults. Best of luck to her.
January 25th, 2010 at 7:49 am
[...] The Hollywood Reporter says “‘The Runaways’ works on a lot of levels, and will no doubt be a big hit with little effort” and “provided just the energy that’s been missing here in Park City. We needed it.” [...]
January 25th, 2010 at 10:15 am
Wow, never knew you were such a perv Roger. I mean, yeah, I knew you couldn’t write, but wow, who knew you were such a perv?
A grown adult calling a 15 year old “sexy” is very sick and very perverted. You really have no place saying that. She may be attractive, or even look good, but “sexy”? Wow, that is just sick.
January 25th, 2010 at 10:43 am
[...] Stewart in Dakota Fanning promovirata svoj film The Runaways na festivalu Sundance. (E!, Showbiz 411, MTV Movies Blog, MTV Hollywood Crush, Access [...]
January 25th, 2010 at 11:06 am
[...] of The Runaways (click the links to read the articles: EW.com Dark Horizons Cinematical MTV.com The Hollywood Reporter Collider.com LA Times [...]
January 25th, 2010 at 11:09 am
Watch out, the Internet moral police are on the prowl. Grow up guys, not everyone are puritans. There is such a thing as unhealthy repression, you know.
January 25th, 2010 at 11:26 am
I would hope her parents could rethink the path they are taking Dakota down. A 15 year old needs to be a 15 year old and to put her her these types of situations may only result in the problems that other female child stars have encountered. Hopefully that’s not the case.
January 25th, 2010 at 11:58 am
It’s so funny how people were mortified over Miley Cyrus’ photo shoot, where she looked too provacative for her age, which was 15 at the time. Now people are saying that Dakota is just showing how versatile of an actress she is, when she is portraying lesbian sex scenes at the age of 15!! Muchless hardcore drugs?! Wow!! This is a real tragedy. Parents are given ONE shot at doing it right. There are no retakes! I feel so sorry for this family.
January 25th, 2010 at 3:37 pm
[...] Do Hollywood Reporter: [...]
January 25th, 2010 at 6:01 pm
@TV on the Brain: The writer isn’t being a perv. When he says she “gets very sexy” in this movie, he is talking about her PERFORMANCE, not saying he finds Dakota to be sexy. And her performance IS “sexy”: she wears sexy clothes (a bodice, etc) and has a lesbian affair. Morally right or wrong, it is an accurate description of her performance (i.e., her character) in the film. CONTEXT is everything.
January 25th, 2010 at 9:36 pm
Sweet Dakota Fanning is absolutely drop dead gorgeous!
January 26th, 2010 at 7:22 am
SAW A FEW CLIPS OF THIS FLICK. THE ACTING IS ATROCIOUS! I ALWAYS THOT SHE COULD BE THE NEXT JODIE FOSTER A LA CHILD ACTOR WHO GROWS UP AND MATURES HER TALENT AS DOES HER AGE. SORRY, DONT THINK THAT’S GONNA HAPPEN IF THIS IS THE WORK WE’RE EXPECTING TO SEE FROM HER. SMH.
January 26th, 2010 at 10:14 am
Dakota’s role in this movie as a “sexy” Cherie Currie is very much age appropriate because Cherie was the same age as Dakota when she was doing these things in real life. Remember this is just *acting* Dakota is doing. It’s not real life.
It really grinds my gears when I see so many people post comments about how “harmful” is it when younger actresses do controversial roles. Here are two examples to consider. Brooke Shields was doing even more controversial things on camera when she was as young or even younger than Dakota Fanning, including nudity in her 1978 movie Pretty Baby. Brooke grew up to graduate from Princeton and is now a still-working actress and mother. Contrast that with Lindsay Lohan who acted in “family friendly” Disney movies at the same age range as Brooke, but ending up getting involved with the drugs & party scene.
January 26th, 2010 at 12:40 pm
@ Brandy:
Yes, he is being a perv. You can NOT call a teenager “sexy” and not be a perv. You just can’t.
January 27th, 2010 at 10:32 am
wow, you really really sound like a pervert PEDOPHILE, i admit Dakota is no saint but she still young… watch out … roger…
January 27th, 2010 at 10:33 am
pedophile
January 27th, 2010 at 10:35 am
oh my God JIM i hope you are under 18 years old….ugh
January 28th, 2010 at 6:03 am
“she wears pearls” really Roger?? You’re hilarious. And I’m almost positive Kristen Stewart is no more awkward than YOU are on the Today show.
January 28th, 2010 at 5:16 pm
[...] The Hollywood Reporter: [...]