Comments on: Michael Jackson Movie Screened for Liz Taylor–And She Loves It

By: aggy

aggy — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:46:10 +0000

Asia needs spellcheck, oh and to live in reality!

By: pam

pam — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:24:00 +0000

I was lucky enough to see “This Is It,” twice in fact. It’s a great tribute. He’s brilliant & intense as ever, and certainly was not at all emaciated, though he was thin. Remember, he’d been working out strenuously & daily with a personal trainer

By: asia

asia — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:09:21 +0000

I HAVE BEEN TO EVERY SINGLE ONE OF MICHEAL JACKSON CONCERT I HAVE ALSO BEEN TO THE THING THAT HE DID IN LONDON AND HE CAME TO MY HOUSE ONCE FOR DINNER WE WENT OUT A COUPLE OF TIMES BUT WE BROCK UP I WENT TO HIS MUMRIAL AND FUNIAL AND I GOT TO MEET HIS KIDS THEY ARE VERY SWEET THEY ALL GAVE ME A HUG WHEN I LEFT IN THE LEMO AND MJ GAVE MY A SIGN IPOD TOUCH AND TWO OF HIS CD AND I GOT TO KISS HIM ON THE FORHEAD THAT NIGHT..

By: Lee

Lee — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:44:16 +0000

oh …. and great-grandkids.

By: Lee

Lee — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:43:32 +0000

Ingrid, to clear up your question. Dame Elizabeth and all four of her children are very close. They are not real big on the spotlight but they truly love their mother, as do the grandkids!

By: Anna

Anna — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:39:58 +0000

I just reread my comment. There’s a typo. I meant disparaging.

By: axon

axon — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:13:45 +0000

OK, I wasn’t coming back, but since you’re addressing me, MJFan – I said “if” there was indeed a necklace, I don’t hang on to illusions if there are facts – but another column by Friedman putting his angle on the necklace incident is proof? We still don’t know the reasons behind the whole affair. Like I also said, in spite of what Friedman wrote I do remember Taylor defending Jackson declaring him innocent of child molestation, but I don’t remember if it was 1993 or 2005.

Anyway, obviously whatever happened they were still friends after 2005 – now Friedman calls Taylor “family”.

By: MJFan

MJFan — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:38:44 +0000

Also, I believe a copy of the necklace contract is online. Forget where I saw it.

By: MJFan

MJFan — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:37:08 +0000

axon: you are free to your illusions. the request for the necklace was documented in court testimony during marc shaffel’s lawsuit against mj. from a friedman 2006 column:

“Taylor in fact was silent as the five-month court proceeding dragged on at this time last year in Santa Maria, Calif. More importantly: King [Larry King] could have asked Dame Elizabeth about the $637,000 piece of jewelry that she received from Jackson as payment for appearing in his “rebuttal video” on FOX in 2003.

The necklace in question was demanded, er, requested by Taylor as compensation for assisting Jackson in trying to rehabilitate his reputation after the famously oily documentary made by Martin Bashir, now an unlikely anchor for “Nightline.”

At the time, Jackson didn’t even have the cash to buy the piece of jewelry. According to court testimony last year and the current civil lawsuit filed by Marc Schaffel, Jackson’s former business associate, Jackson borrowed the money from Schaffel to buy Liz her “gift.” When Schaffel vs. Jackson commences soon in Los Angeles, the entire episode will be entered into evidence….”

the full story here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,197585,00.html

By: Anna

Anna — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:07:02 +0000

Pat, I doubt that’s true about Michael paying his mom, after all, he was already supporting her anyway.

I wish people who say they support MJ’s kids would stop with the diparaging remarks about the Jacksons, the Jacksons are their family and who they are living with, so those comments are hurting those kids now too.

CaliMJ, I saw Miko in the pictures of the group of Jackson cousins who went to the amusement park with Liz Taylor.