It’s sort of amazing watching Shmuley Boteach, a rabbi with no congregation other than an unwitting public, selling out Michael Jackson. He’s just published a book of interviews he taped with Michael back in 2000-2001. All the money goes to Boteach. There’s no charity involved. (Ironically, Boteach also recently published a book called “The Blessing of Enough: Rejecting Material Greed, Embracing Spiritual Hunger.”)
That wasn’t the case in 2000 when I met both Michael and Boteach together one November night. It was at the home of PR guru Howard Rubenstein. Boteach had convinced Michael to start a new charity with him called Time for Kids. They were going to teach parents to spend time with their children.
There were about 3o people in the Rubensteins’ Fifth Avenue living room. Boteach gave a long speech about Michael being the “most misunderstood” celebrity in the world, said he loved children so much he had mannequins of them in his Neverland bedroom. That revelation went over like a lead balloon.
On February 14, 2001, Time for Kids had its first and only get together, People bought tickets to see Michael, Boteach and assorted celebrities like Johnnie Cochran, Mother Love, Judith Regan, Chuck Woolery and Dr. Drew Pinsky talk about spending more time with children. The event was called “Love, Work, and Parenting: Can You Be a Success in the Bedroom, the Boardroom, and the Family Room?” It was only 70% full. The tickets were $40, $30, and $20.
Michael told the crowd, when he finally spoke: “I’m having trouble finding a date for myself even though Rabbi Shmuley tells me he’s going to find me the perfect woman. And I tell him, as long as it’s not a journalist!” Here’s a transcript of Michael’s speech.
When the accounting for the event finally came in on a Form 990, it showed (I reported then) a total of $203,185 collected from direct public support. At the same time, the charity’s expenses totaled $259,432. All but $20,000 of that was spent on staff salaries and office expenses. No money went to children of any kind.
Listed on the IRS filing were an organization president, secretary and treasurer. The latter two, this reporter discovered after making some calls, were Boteach’s sister and mother. The sister, Ateret Diveroli, repeated exactly what the mother had: “I’m not part of that anymore.”
Mrs. Diveroli insisted to me that her brother was “very honest” and had stopped working with Michael Jackson “because nothing was happening. He wasn’t doing anything.”
That was pretty much it for Michael and Shmuley’s friendship. There was a trip to Oxford a couple of months later, but by June 2001 Jackson’s “Invincible” album came out. In September he performed his 30th anniversary shows. Shmuley was gone. From the time Jackson was arrested in 2003 until his death, Boteach was out of his life. Jackson surely had no memory of making tapes with Boteach, and no desire to have them published.
And yet, Shmuley is back. He will flog his short, unheralded relationship to Michael Jackson for as long as the public — or TV bookers– can bear it. The real kicker: that his publicist sent out press releases yesterday, on Yom Kippur, offering copies of the book and excerpts. While every other rabbi in the world was praying, Shmuley Boteach was busy marketing Michael Jackson for profit. Buyer beware.






September 29th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
Rabbi Boteach is cyanide. Pure cyanide.
September 29th, 2009 at 12:18 pm
Now I’ve read Michael’s speech. Nothing wrong with it – advocating parents make time for their children instead of leaving them to TV and video games, something like that.
September 29th, 2009 at 3:31 pm
My mom told me she saw part of an interview that Shmuley did with Meredith Vieira on “Dateline” last Friday. I thought that was odd..publishing a book on these tapes. What about confidentiality? I’m sure that MJ never would have thought his private conversations with this rabbi would be published for profit. I think it’s disgusting. I think this Shmuley is another profiteer. I think Roger has him pegged just right.
September 29th, 2009 at 3:33 pm
That so called rabbi is awful. I wonder why more people don’t see that. There is no way Michael would have wanted this out there like that. I’m surprised the estate didn’t shut this project down.
September 29th, 2009 at 3:35 pm
Well, he’ll be on Larry King tonight hawking this book so it seems the media is interested (like they would’nt!)
This Rabbi is a disgrace and was never MJ’s friend, just another one of those hangers on.
September 29th, 2009 at 5:01 pm
Michael is no longer here to refute what Boteach claims. “I had permission from Michael to tape him.” Oh yeah? Michael cannot argue with that now, can he? “Michael wanted the world to hear these tapes.” Oh yeah? Michael cannot argue with that now, can he? This man does not deserve out attention.
September 29th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
Please. Roger doesn’t think Jacko was a pedophile. What a joke.
September 29th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
Boteach is as shady as he ever was. I hope all of MJ’s new post-mortem fans don’t buy the hype, those of us that have been arounf KNOW the score
September 29th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
@Athina
No dear the joke here is: Why on earth a sad hater such as yourself is commenting on someone they dont like? Get a life sweetie
September 29th, 2009 at 8:56 pm
It’s a sad day when Shmuley is still alive and being evil and Michael’s 3 innocent children are without a father to love them due to being murdered. If there is a HELL I hope there is a hot spot to burn Shmuley for eternity.
September 29th, 2009 at 9:27 pm
Didn’t Michael Jackson have any loyal friends? Is it possible he was the worst judge of character ever?
September 29th, 2009 at 11:01 pm
Tuesday Afternoon: Ross and Taylor were loyal, I suppose. Others who were we won’t hear anything about, because they don’t talk.
It seems Uri Geller, who did a lot to try help MJ get rid of his drug habits, unfortunately introduced him to both Bashir and Boteach.
Thanks Roger, for not calling Michael Jackson Jacko in this headline.
September 30th, 2009 at 12:08 am
I, too, appreciate Friedman referring to Michael by his given name. I also appreciate Friedman calling Smelly Lowleech what he is–a parasite–but Friedman has not always been so respectful of Michael. The truth will come out one day, and all of journalism–tabloid and mainstream–will have to eat shit. It seems that hardly anyone in journalism has character, integrity, compassion or basic decency. Who raised these people?
September 30th, 2009 at 4:03 am
Yes, what about confidentiality? This whole story seems so ethically and morally wrong? It’s sad to see people so driven by greed. It’s a good thing MJ isn’t around to witness what is happening.
September 30th, 2009 at 4:49 am
Boteach is just another one of the long list of people who have exploited Michael Jackson during his life and now death for their own personal fame and fortune. It is the lowest of the low to use the personal recordings of a dead person’s innermost thoughts and feelings for profit.
September 30th, 2009 at 5:18 am
Athina.. Your an idiot who is obviously just as ignorant as this disgraced Rabbi. Go get educated on the facts thencome back and make intelligent comments!! Really, you haters are like republicans right now..trying to hang onto anything when you are the minority! Hate to make a bad day for you but MJ was no child molester you know it too so really take your troll ass somewhere else! And yes Roger, thanks for using MJ’s REAL name!!
September 30th, 2009 at 6:15 am
I’m glad someone has finally said out loud what everybody’s thinking. Thank you very much for this article, Mr. Friedman – it’s about the only objective and insightful one on this matter I have found.
September 30th, 2009 at 6:22 am
Aren’t you a little late with this story Roger??? Anyway, I hope no one supports this butt face Rabbi. Michael isn’t here to defend himself and if he was truly a friend of Michael’s then they would have still been speaking prior to his death. They did not speak to each other in 8yrs and he called himself a friend. What friend does that to another? Sounds like the sound bite ex-Manager who revealed tapes on The Insider and that other gossip night show on CBS. My God, it makes you realize that you can’t trust people at all. He needs to be lined up and beaten like the traitor he is. He is always looking to reinvent himself using others so that he can gain cash, to clean up his messy life. Roger why didn’t you talk about his current financial dilemma? I bet you Michael didn’t know that he was being taped, what kind of friend does that, but the other question is, why didn’t he reveal this prior to Michael’s death, since he claimed that Michael wanted to release this? Can we say LIAR for someone who is a Rabbi … a b*tch slap or Karma is waiting somewhere for this man, hell knows no fury.
September 30th, 2009 at 7:27 am
Thanks Roger for exposing this lying and cheating Rabbi! I just want to beg the new find MJ Fans to avoid books like this because they are fabrication and lieswhich uses snapshots of MJ own words during a moment of counseling and vulnerability to sell books and make money off of MJ our beloved King of Music and Art. You see those of us that have been around for the duration know MJ and first he would never approve being taped like this being as open about some of the names and people being mention in such a manner excess as part of a counseling session. MJ really thought he had found a friend and a confidant-someone he can share his most intimate secrets with and them be save. This explains how this beautiful man could need assist with a severe sleep disorder and anxiety but feel with a billion dollars in assets that the only assistance he could get was from an anesthetic and the worse cardiology ever in life. Shumley wasn’t suppose to be a counselor and Spiritual advisor so MJ already knew what happen when you share your intimate moments – they tape you, get you involved in one of their crooky schemes, lie around around town on you and exploit your dearest friends for money, and wait for you to die then say I told you so as if they are revealing the Holy scroll. The issue is this slimmy folks once again underestimate the intelligence of MJ and his great fan base. You see MJ has experienced unconditional love and acceptance from his Fans so he know when it starts to smell different. I’m glad this freak of a Rabbi only got 30 hrs of information and I’m sure MJ started to feel uncomfortable with him and cut off the relationship/fake counseling sessions. Note of Good new: 99% of the Jewish website commentors are on MJ, his children & mothers and his Fans side as well as the Rabbi community has denounced this fraud of a Rabbi as just that a fraud. This is from the U.S. Jewsish communities around the world to Isarel. Shumley underestimated MJ’s friendship with key Jewish leaders like Sharon and today’s leaders and they all have made statements denouncing him revealing MJ personal words and thoughts to the public and in a book. Rabbi had already kicked him out years ago even from the most Liberal Rabbi organization and they have gotten to gether with other organization on site I read to stop his release of the book thru publically denouncing him and calling him a fraud.
September 30th, 2009 at 9:58 am
I’m a fan of MJ and I’m not defending the Rabbi, but MJ didn’t seem like a fool. What was the purpose of taping the conversation if not to use them later for SOME purpose (i.e. a book, etc.)? Why would MJ allow himself to be recorded? MJ could have kept his conversations with the Rabbi private, but he chose to record them. IF the Rabbi secretly recorded the conversation then it’s black & white (he should not have released the tapes), but with MJ’s knowledge I don’t see an issue.
September 30th, 2009 at 10:42 am
Seems like most of you didn’t see the interview- the Rabbi said Jackson wanted this to get out. He didn’t put it out until now because Michael slipped back into his old habits with kids, etc. Now, he wants the public to know of Michael’s suffering. I think it helps us get a better understanding of the performer.
September 30th, 2009 at 11:31 am
“the Rabbi said Jackson wanted this to get out”
Well, duh, of course the rabbi would say that. Where’s the signed release form Michael Jackson stating that it was fine with him that Boteach profits from his confidential “counseling” sessions? MJ never made negatuve statements for attribution about other artists at any time in his career, even when they were cruel to him. It’s impossible to believe he wanted his (rather mild) criticism of Madonna blasted over the air and in a book.
September 30th, 2009 at 12:15 pm
Music Expert I saw the entire thing,so, I know exactly what he said.
” Michael slipped back into his old habits with kids, etc. Now, he wants the public to know of Michael’s suffering. I think it helps us get a better understanding of the performer.”
Where is the sign document saying he wanted to release this information or a statment on the tapes that he is taping of his free will and for future published works to use the tapes as source documents!
Shmuley did not say that he slipped back in his habit of kids…He never had a habit of kids you dirty liar because maybe you have one and you trying to project your stinky habits and self destruction off on MJ as self-righteous MORTAL when you should be dancing in hell with the devil.
He stated that Michael release Invincible and went back to his habits of fortune, fame, and the King Of Pop – Whatever that means. He for some reason seem disappointed and angry that MJ was not giving up his music career to run around the world begging for money for boteach to place in his phony charities. He told Meridith he never saw MJ hurt a child or do illegal or legal RX drugs. However, regardless of all of his fake concern and wanting to show “the real side of MJ” was only for his personal financial gain and not MJ. This man was and is all about making money off of Michael’s back because if he was such a spiritual leader, he would have been offering him some serious counseling rather than sitting around for 7-8 years holding on to some tapes hoping the man died. Why didn’t he try to get him some assistance during that time to prevent his death and why not release the tapes when MJ was going through the worse time of his life between 2003-2005? Why not speak out in your friends favor afterward even to provide him some redemption from the public and media, especially if you want to show the world who Michael really was at his core existence? Right, he didn’t do it because none of it’s release had anything to do with saving Michael Joseph Jackson but to make or steal as much money from this man as possible. I wonder how a person can treat someone who have three under aged children who just lost their Father and only active parent in such a shabby and insensitive manner; and a man who pretend to be their Father’s friend and Spiritual adviser. Remember, these children have played at his home, eaten at his home, and He and his children have been to Neverland and traveled around the world on this deceased Father – Michael Jackson’s dime. A man of God conducting himself in such a haphazard and callous manner – interesting!
September 30th, 2009 at 3:38 pm
Come on everybody, calm down. Why would Michael care if some tapes of his opinions were released, sorry but I think the Rabbi(with or without a congregation) really tried to help him(as did Lisa marie and look what happened to her?)and MJ just got bored with the advice and that was that. He did have a habit of dropping people when he tired of them, stop the pretense of sainthood, I defy anyone to doubt my affection for this great lost artist but he was a man with many problems. if he thought he could talk Hitler out of his madness, then we have to ask ourseves who disillusioned? This has nothing to do with sacrileg-let us all grow up a little on this one!
September 30th, 2009 at 5:54 pm
“I think the Rabbi(with or without a congregation) really tried to help him(as did Lisa marie and look what happened to her”
Please share – what happened to Lisa Marie, other than her collecting millions for a marriage that lasted less than two years?
You’re correct about MJ dropping people when he got tired of them. That was his right. Most of us do the same thing, but the difference is that our acquaintances probably don’t turn being dropped into a payday.
September 30th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
I reiterate what RosySpeak said: Thanks Roger for exposing this vulture, Judas – trying to prey on MJ and cashing in on his death. Micheal tried very hard to keep his private life private and I seriously doubt he would’ve ever given permission to make this information public. Does the Serpent Shmuck have a recording of Michael giving permission to make these tapes public? I seriously doubts he does.
September 30th, 2009 at 7:57 pm
Lisa Marie Presley didn’t collect anything – that’s one of the things Michael Jackson said on those tapes. She didn’t take a cent. Never jump to conclusions.
Why would MJ mind? Well, we don’t know if he would, do we? Neither does Shmuley – that’s why he never asked MJ for permission to publish, as far as we know, but waited until he died.
September 30th, 2009 at 10:09 pm
SIMBA & AXON — While it is true that Lisa Marie Presley DID NOT go after MJ for any of his real property or any long term spousal support. (As MJ stated in the Rabbi tapes), In the divorce settlement SHE DID DEMAND AND WAS GRANTED (1) 10% of all profits from MJ’s HIStory album sales in perpetuity; (2) MJ’s was required to cover all of LMP’s court, attorney and legal fees pertaining to the divorce; (3) MJ’s wanted LMP to agree to NEVER to write any sort of tell-all expose about him or their marriage as part of their divorce agreement. LMP refused and asked the court to preserve her right to pen a book about her time with MJ if she should ever choose to do so in the future. The court agreed with LMP. If she wants to write a book about him she can.
September 30th, 2009 at 10:57 pm
Mjuls: Well, if she got percentage of an album, it’s strange that MJ said the took nothing.
I doubt she will write a book in the short term, but if she does, I believe it will be more well-balanced than that of SB. Her blog the day after MJ’s death (”He knew”) was a class act.
October 1st, 2009 at 12:31 am
Lisa marie was in bad shape after her marriage to MJ, which, by the way was not a sham or a set-up, HOWEVER, I think he tired of her ,too, she was into changing him or saving him or whatever, he was into having a family which she already had, in the end I think she was the closest he came to normalcy and even that didn’t last. I have formed my own opinions of the ‘man of mystery’ but I would anger so many people that I will contemplate these theories alone, always glad for your input Roger ps As far as I know mjuls information is correct, she didn’t walk away without a cent.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:06 am
Hi Axon – In all fairness to MJ (in the context of the Rabbi’s tapes) I think they were speaking of tangibles (real property, cash, support, etc.). However, a simple L/N search of MJ and LMP’s divorce papers will verify the information in my earlier post. Cheers.
Mary Maude Henry – I wish you would share your opinions on MJ. I’ve read some of your other postings and they are always thoughtful. Cheers.
October 1st, 2009 at 6:02 am
Mjuls, thank you so much for the interest, I am still sorting the pieces but a lot has to do with serious personality disorder combined with death-defying drug addiciton combined with utter charm and talent, ever see the home movies, what a difference to the face he presented to the world, this shattered shatterd being whose selfishness did him in ,too. Please don’t give me any grief people, I have done some serious research on the cliff plungers that I have adored, mjula, have a good day. MMH
October 1st, 2009 at 6:36 am
Mary Maude Henry – As I stated in my earlier post, your postings are always thoughtful. Thank you for sharing your opinion. I tend to agree with you. Ultimately, the only person with the power to save MJ was MJ. All the love in world – and lets face it, because of his talent & gifts he received more than most of us will ever experience in our lifetimes – is meaningless unless you love yourself. All the best to you.
October 1st, 2009 at 8:56 am
Mr. Freidman, thank you for letting us know some interesting facts about the rabbi.
I found an article he played a part of this tape in 2005 on ABC “Singer explained that helping children was something of a calling” on mtv.com (/news/articles/1503593/20050607/jackson_michael.jhtml)
He said he is not sure whether Michael was a child molester or not on NBC, but in 2005, he said Michael was innocent.
Besides, in 2005, the rabbi said this tape is for creating a parenting book (not for understanding Michael better). So, I can not trust him at all….
October 1st, 2009 at 12:52 pm
[...] Taken From: showbiz411.blogs.thr.com/michael-jackson-shmuley-boteach-tapes/ [...]
October 1st, 2009 at 6:29 pm
” serious personality disorder combined with death-defying drug addiciton combined with utter charm and talent”
Yeah, but generally anyone with a “death-defying drug addiciton (sic)” would be expected to have drugs in their system when all that defying failed them and they died. The autopsy report on MJ came out today – no drugs, other than those administered by Conrad Murray. Not even alcohol. Michael Jackson was NOT an addict.
A psychiatrist would spend a lot of time with a patient before determining whether they had a personality disorder. Diagnosing someone you don’t know is just plain silly.
October 1st, 2009 at 8:22 pm
HI SIMBA – MJ’s death has stirred something in all of us (if it didn’t we wouldn’t bother to comment.) Mary Maude said in her post that she has researched the topic in-depth which propelled her theory. Maybe she is on to something, who knows. She simply offered an opinion and she obviously has given this a great deal of thought even if you (or anyone) do not agree with her theory. It was a theory, not a diagnosis. If we are all the sum of our experiences, then hopefully there is an opportunity for us to learn something from each other by contributing in this sort of open forum. Your passion about what happened to MJ is evident in all of your postings and I have no doubt your insights vis-à-vis your own experiences are equally enlightening.
However, I do think it is vital to point out that addiction by its very definition is a lifelong affliction. A dependency. MJ himself went on national television in December 1993 and told the world the suffered from a dependency to pain killers. (Here’s link, see for yourself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoRULG4kmZw ) The why and how he started using ultimately does not matter. MJ has been a clinically diagnosed addict for more than 20 years – by his own admission. Even if he was in recovery/treatment the entire time (and we know for certain he went to rehab and sought treatment on two different occasions) he was still an addict by all definition. Be well, Simba, I look forward to your future postings.
October 2nd, 2009 at 6:29 am
Thank you so much Mjuls for your support, Simba, I said it was a personal and researched analysis that I was expressing, get off your high horse, if the man of mystery admits that he is an addict, why can’t you? Besides he was warned and so many tried to help him, at which point calls were not returned, do you honestly think that Murray gave him ‘chemical support’ against his will? mjuls, you write so well and if anyone has researched, you have. I think I will retire from the net for awhile, there doesn’t seem to be room for a real dialogue but I have lived through addiction enough to recognize the signs. perhaps Simba is right, I am not a psychiatrist, he was a saint, he was an angel, he was 100% healthy, it was all a media campaign and blah blah blah…told you this would happen…Michael you are still on our minds…have a nice day. MMH
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:20 am
DISGUSTING LEECH WHO STEALS FROM CHARITIES! These are the kinds of people media give a platform. No wonder the world is falling into an abyss.
RIP MJ
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:34 am
Well what do you expect? Boteach is a Jew. If he sees profit, he’s going to take it. Michael was right when he sang “Don’t Care About Us”. God bless MJ.
October 2nd, 2009 at 9:49 am
marymaudehenry and mjuls – I am writing as someone who has worked with pre-eminent psychiatrists in a support capacity, not as someone who thinks that Michael Jackson was an “angel”. NO reputable psychiatrist would offer up a drive-by diagnosis of a patient. It could take months of interaction to determine the nature of a psychosis, or if there is one at all.
MJ has been a media-diganosed addict since he died. (They didn’t give a shit before.) The addiction industry had a field day declaring that it was inevitable that he died from an overdose of prescription drugs. It was terribly inconvenient for them that he didn’t.
All of the “friends” and colleagues who claimed they warned MJ have ulterior motives, either the protection of their reputations, or a possible defense if they are indicted. I don’t believe that the one doctor who actually treated him on a regular basis (Arnold Klein) ever stated that he discussed possible drug problems with him. We do know that he had Debbie Rowe administer enormous doses of Demerol to him, which probably triggered the dependency that MJ developed, and apparently overcame.
We don’t know what MJ knew about the dangers of Diprivan. We do know that using it in the first place had to be some doctor’s idea – it isn’t a prescription drug, and is unavailable outside of the hospital setting.
Dialogue doesn’t mean agreement. marymaudehenry offered her opinion, and I’m offering mine.
October 3rd, 2009 at 2:52 am
Simba, all these opinions.
I bought my tickets for This is It. My husband(not a Michael Jackson fan and who was nearly driven mad by my ‘research’) watched a clip of This is It with me the other night and said (very kindly) ‘well, you know this boy could have still put on a good show, people would have been glad just to see him again.’I think that sums it up.We would have been glad just to see him again…this boy.MMH
October 5th, 2009 at 10:25 am
Mr. Friedman, have you read the article “The day Michael Jackson told me he could save Hitler” written by the rabbi in 2005? After reading this, I don’t think he likes MJ at all… I’m certain he is just exploiting MJ. However, TV stations are not ridiculing the rabbi. It seems not fair for MJ.
I read you stopped calling MJ “Jacko.” If you have a chance, can you write your thought about the relationship MJ and the media? I just think the media was too harsh for MJ, and I would like to know some opinion from a journalist.
October 9th, 2009 at 10:50 am
Thank You Roger. You seem to be one of a very few who are willing to tell the truth about this so-called Rabbi.
Wish you’d cover his real agenda and how he attempted to use MJs celebrity to advance it.
“Make the World More Jewish””, “To get Jews interested in the Jewish world,” he later said, “you have to get the non-Jews interested. The Jews will follow what the non-Jews are doing.” Boteach wants everyone to have Friday Night dinners with their families (Shabbat). Not a bad idea, but his means to an end are deceptive and manipulative. MJ advocated a “Cherish the Child Day”, like Mother’s/Father’s Day.
He and MJ were working on a book “about what parents and adults can learn from children and how men and women may recapture lost, yet virtuous, childlike qualities.” Not a Tell-All Confessional of a “Tragic Icon” as Boteach portrays him. This is a violation of confidence and Boteach has not produced one shread of evidence he even had a contract with MJ stating how the material would be used. And those conducting interview have not demanded it.
November 20th, 2009 at 9:45 pm
Roger,
Does it really matter if Rabbi Boteach is not the Rabbi of a synagoge?? Arent you bending over backwards a bit here?? Why do you make assumption that Michael did not allow his session to be taped? With regards to the charity – I would like to hear the Rabbi’s point of view on it.
I have read parts of his book and with regards to Michael – it is spot on (Rabbi or no Rabbi). Michael is described as someone who went out of his way (I would say in in a pathalogical way) to exhibit bizarre and myterious behavior – some of which is well documented – in order to attract attention and public adulation…
And this is not even referring to the charges of molestation (which are a separate but obviously very serious issue entirely). The guy was obviously troubled. And the book itself goes beyond just the mere factual events in Michael’s life and gets into his spiritual and psychological void that did unfortunately exist.
Really, The Rabbi is doing a public service – in demystifying someone who tried to appear as more than human and brings him down to earth for all to see. I recommend the book highly.
January 14th, 2010 at 7:57 pm
It seems to me that if Michael wanted this information to be released he would have stated that on the tapes. I don’t think that they should have been released. In addition to being an invasion of privacy, he may have had different thoughts on the topics discussed before his death so it is not that reliable.
As for Lisa Marie Presley, I don’t think the marriage was a sham but they seemed to have different agendas. She wanted to save him and re-mold him. He had earned, not inherited his wealth and fame and by all accounts, although nice and agreeable was an independent spirit and he wanted to have a marriage and family. To step into a marriage to save someone is somewhat of an insult to the person being “saved”. Although she probably meant well it indicates a teenage mentality to think she could save or change someone she became involved with while still married to someone else, by the way. He said he liked women with class and Lisa had a potty mouth that extended to her music, ie: the lyrics to Idiot or Turbulence.
But…he did say that he appreciated how she tried to help him and it is too bad things did not work out.
MJ was a gentleman because he did not bad mouth her after the divorce the way she did him. I guess I still have ill feelings towards her because of the way she and her mother talked about him on Oprah when he was on trial….that is like kicking someone when they are down.
RIP Michael
January 25th, 2010 at 1:34 am
Good for him. Jackson was a fool. Somebody was going to take the little boy lover for a ride. So what if the Rabbi wrote a book?